Comparison Between Different Transport Layer Mobility Protocols

MIST Central Library Repository

Show simple item record Nawrin Ferdous, Chowdhury Asif-Ur-Rahaman, Md. Ahsan Ullah, Md. 2015-06-28T05:42:23Z 2015-06-28T05:42:23Z 2013-12
dc.description We are thankful to Almighty Allah for his blessings for the successful completion of our thesis. Our heartiest gratitude, profound indebtedness and deep respect go to our supervisor Dr. Md. Shohrab Hossain, Assistant Professor, Dept of CSE, BUET, Dhaka, Bangladesh, forhisconstantsupervision,affectionateguidanceandgreatencouragementandmotivation. His keen interest on the topic and valuable advices throughout the study was of great help in completing thesis. We are especially grateful to the Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) of Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) for providing their all out support during the thesis work. Finally, we would like to thank our families and our course mates for their appreciable assistance, patience and suggestions during the course of our thesis. en_US
dc.description.abstract Mobility of Internet hosts allows computing nodes to move between subnets. In order to provide seamless connectivity to the roaming users several mobility protocols have been developed at different layers. Mobile IP has been developed to handle mobility of Internet hosts at the network layer. Transport layer mobility can overcome many of the limitations of network layer schemes. Various approaches have been proposed to implement mobility in the transport layer. In this thesis, we discuss a number of transport layer mobility protocols, classify them according to their approach, and compare them based on a number of evaluation criteria. The components of a complete mobility management scheme consist of handoff, connection migration, and location management. Evaluation criteria have been developed to determine and compare the effectiveness of mobility schemes. The criteria include handoff, packet loss and delay, fault tolerance, requirement for change in network infrastructure, mobility type, support for IP diversity, security, scalability, etc. In this thesis, we use the above criteria to classify the proposed mobility schemes. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries B.Sc. in Computer Science and Engineering Thesis;TP-
dc.subject Comparison, Different, Transport, Layer, Mobility, Protocols en_US
dc.title Comparison Between Different Transport Layer Mobility Protocols en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account